home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
090594
/
09059915.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-10-03
|
5KB
|
91 lines
<text id=94TT1185>
<title>
Sep. 05, 1994: Capitol Hill:A Chance to Be Heard
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
Sep. 05, 1994 Ready to Talk Now?:Castro
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
TIME ON CAPITOL HILL, Page 24
A Chance to Be Heard
</hdr>
<body>
<p> Consumed by debates over health-care reform and the crime bill,
legislators have left four other major issues to languish. With
votes on these expected before the 103rd Congress adjourns this
fall, there is still time to influence the outcome. Time invites
you to use the attached postcard to express your views.
</p>
<p> GATT: Last December 117 nations agreed on a plan to revise the
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. The changes in the global
pact would reduce tariffs on manufactured goods, cut agricultural
subsidies, tighten the protection of intellectual-property rights
and create a new mechanism to mediate future trade disputes.
Congress is considering whether to approve U.S. participation
in the agreement. Opponents ranging from Pat Buchanan to Ralph
Nader warn that the new treaty would require the U.S. to defer
to a supranational body on such matters as automobile-emission
levels, product warning labels and safety standards. Supporters
say the revised treaty could help America's economy grow an
additional $200 billion annually, or about 3% a year, over the
next decade. The Clinton Administration hopes to persuade Congress
to approve the agreement this fall without any amendment, under
the so-called fast-track procedure, calling for a single up-or-down
vote.
</p>
<p> TELECOMMUNICATIONS: In an effort to keep up with rapidly changing
technology, both houses have been working to update the laws
and regulations that govern the telephone and television industries,
with the goals of encouraging competition and accelerating construction
of the information superhighway. In June, by comfortable margins,
the House passed two bills (now combined into one, designated
HR3626) intended to increase competition among cable-TV and
phone companies. The bill would permit regional phone companies,
the so-called Baby Bells, to get into the long-distance phone
business from which they are now barred in exchange for granting
their competitors, including cable-TV companies, access to their
transmission and switching systems. The bill would also allow
cable-TV companies and long-distance carriers to provide local
phone service. In the Senate on Aug. 11, the Commerce Committee
sent to the floor S1822, a bill that would permit the same process
but stipulates that the Baby Bells cannot enter long-distance
markets until the Justice Department and the Federal Communications
Commission confirm that they have opened their lines to competitors.
That could take several years. The House version lets them in
after one year, regardless of competition. The House version
is expected to go to the Senate floor in September.
</p>
<p> INTERSTATE BANKING: In late July, House and Senate conferees
reached agreement on HR3841, the interstate banking bill, which
would allow bank holding companies to establish separately managed
and capitalized banks and branches in more than one state. Its
sponsors claim that the legislation will make banking more convenient
for customers and foster a leaner, stabler and more profitable
banking system. A Senate vote was delayed Aug. 9, when Texas
Republican Phil Gramm lodged a point of order involving his
state's banking laws. Final action is expected sometime after
Labor Day.
</p>
<p> LOBBYING AND GIFTS: For more a year, legislators have been struggling
with the delicate issue of how much they should disclose about
their contacts with lobbyists as well as the gifts and favors
proffered by them. Based on votes taken in May 1993, the Senate
is prepared to ban all gifts except those from friends and relatives.
The House, however, has so far shown a willingness to permit
certain gifts and favors from lobbyists, such as subsidized
conferences and trips on behalf of charitable causes. Under
discussion is a compromise that would bar acceptance of any
"gifts of value," a term as yet undefined, from lobbyists, as
well as recreational trips paid for by interest groups. Such
a compromise would still allow each body to set its own rules
governing gifts from nonlobbyists. How such rules would be enforced
remains another open issue.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>